Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:32

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
6 Ways You Can Control Microplastics From Getting Into Your Food - HuffPost
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What was your best experience of having your navel touched?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why do men suck dick? Me, I can't get enough
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Former Charles Manson follower is recommended for parole - NBC News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Which animal has the best sense of smell? - Live Science
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
A new perk for Costco executive members quietly punishes everyone else - SFGATE
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
ADHD link to severe premenstrual disorder uncovered in women - Medical Xpress